The Downward Trend Of Fur Industry Showed That The Price Continued To Decline During The Year.

In the leather industry, China Leather Association statistics show that in 2013, the tannery industry made light leather output of 550 million square meters, down 23.7% compared to the same period last year. Zhejiang, Hebei and Henan rank the top three, accounting for 22%, 20.5% and 13.8% respectively. Hebei's tannery output decreased by 47% year-round, while Zhejiang's decline was 1.2%, while that of other tannery provinces in Shandong and Guangdong was 26% and 72% respectively.

The decline in production is mainly due to the market downturn and the impact of inventory digestion, and the raw materials related to leather making. Cowhide The supply of the market is insufficient, and prices remain high.

stay Fur In the field, due to overheated development in recent years, the downward trend of fur industry appears. Because fur farming and specialized markets are everywhere, prices are falling.

2013 since the second half of the year, Raccoon skin From the beginning of 2013, the peak was reduced to over 300 yuan per 1000 yuan or more, the largest decline was nearly 70%, and there was a downward trend.

Due to the decline in sales and prices, a lot of fur is backlog. On the original leather side, the international leather price, which was mainly supported by the Chinese market, dropped by 30% in December 2013 compared with September. In 2014 February, the auction price fell further by nearly 30%, with a cumulative drop of about 50%, and the turning point of the fur industry has already appeared.

Relatively speaking, the output index of leather clothing and leather shoes increased slightly. Of them, leather clothing production was 62 million 300 thousand, an increase of 7% compared with the same period last year, while the output of Liaoning and Sichuan, the top ten provinces, dropped sharply from 20% to 30% over the same period last year.

Leather shoes produced 4 billion 930 million pairs, an increase of 2.6% over the same period. Among the top ten provinces, only the first place in Fujian (34.2%) output growth slowed down 3.6 points, and the rest of the province increased to varying degrees.

Related links:

The European Union Council issued a decision to reject the proposal of the European Commission to impose anti-dumping duties on Chinese leather shoes. In 2006, the EU decided to take anti-dumping measures on leather shoes originating in China and Vietnam. After sunset review, it decided to terminate anti-dumping measures in March 31, 2011. Some Chinese leather shoes exporters (Brosmann, AOKANG, etc.) have appealed to the European Court of justice for EU anti-dumping.

In 2012, the European Court of final appeal decided that even if the examination of market economic treatment did not necessarily lead to a lower anti-dumping duty on the plaintiff enterprises, the EC still had the obligation to examine the application of the market economic treatment proposed by the plaintiffs. According to the judgment, the Commission decided to re examine the market economic treatment of plaintiff enterprises during the initial investigation period.

The European Commission has reiterated that the plaintiffs do not comply with the conditions of the market economy treatment, and proposed to the EU Council on February 19 to levy anti-dumping duties on the products involved in the export of the plaintiff's enterprises.

The EU Council believes that when the taxpayers (importers) are refunded according to the court's judgment, the anti-dumping duty that has already been collected can be legally reclaimed according to the statutory law of the Customs Law, which has been legally repaid for three years, so the duty of payment has been eliminated. Therefore, the decision to re impose anti-dumping duties will infringe the legitimate expectations of the taxpayers concerned, and the European Commission's legal basis for proposing the anti-dumping duty is insufficient.